Apart from the fact that the elections of May 6, 2012 are de facto
null and void elections that most certainly carry grave dangers of
ballot-rigging, usurping of votes, manipulating the electoral body,
grave lack of transparency, etc., it is absolutely clear that even if
these elections were not controlled by a non-legitimate government
installed in place by foreign interests that bear no link to local
Greek interests, the complete lack of information by all candidate
parties on their pre-election platforms, would have annulled them
anyway.
It is not just the lack of clarity – and the plethora of wishful
thinking that one sees abundant in the effort of every partyʼs or
coalition of parties to attract voters without any semblance of felt
obligation to keep the promises, it is also the multitude of specific
pre-announced actions which however bear no connection to reality, are
completely baseless, are supported by no studies, bear no objective
evidence and tangible proof that all these programs are viable,
applicable and safe for the Country (ranging from the super schools
promised by PASOK in 2009 to the great Greece but without any
diplomatic protection promised by the Golden Dawn, to the adoption of
national currency also promised by many with dubious alliances).
The voter has only one weapon to protect him or herself from all this
deluge of false and dangerous mayhem of promises, blackmails and
terrorism via communicative games, so that all parties in tandem, will
eventually push the electorate to either one or the other of the two
political parties.
This is the legal demand for a binding answer to the questions that
touch upon their pre-election programs, which may be of interest or
are construed as threat on the part of the voter.
With this demand in hand we were able to prove legally (because it was
any way clear to the common sense and logic) GAPʼs malicious intent as
well as that of his governments.
But these elections are set to take place in next to now time, that in
fact disallow the voter from proper updating, or enough time to peruse
and deliberate on the evidence, even if that information is eventually
supplied orally (where by deliberation and data processing we mean our
capacity to double-check their claims and search for evidence to the
contrary, etc.), let alone when such information is supplied in
writing, if and only if one of those petty kinglets would dare commit
himself in writing undersigning a pertinent document to the Greek
Citizen referring to whatever he claims to realise during his
pre-election campaign. This alone shows malicious intent, because time
pressure for the signing of any contract renders that contract null
and void, or at least suspect.
It is no longer possible time-wise to ask these needed questions and
demand a written answer.
It is however still possible for us to see as voters what kind of
questions should have been answered concretely and not generally or
evasively by any party which aspires to get more than 3% of the
electoral vote.
Thus, our fellow co-Citizens write open letters, which we, or whoever
undersigns them, email of fax to the party leaders and demand their
clear answers and commitments in public, since no public debate will
be held where all the answers would have been safe for them anyhow.
We therefore invite them to answer straight to the Greek People since
it is the Greek People from whom they seek to be mandated as their
lawful servants and interest bearers.
Every single day we shall be uploading three parties, for whom our
co-Citizens have a list of questions after having carefully read
through their pre-election platforms and we invite and welcome every
other co-Citizen to add his or her own questions or data, emailing me
at olgayeri@gmail.com.
Translation courtesy of Michael T.