Since at least the beginning of the 20th century, if not earlier, there is historical and written recording of the seeking and active attempt to create a new version of the Roman empire but with a harsher and more oppressive form. From this position began the concept of Globalization which includes the concept of suppression on all levels (National, cultural, state and military) and which was first officially attempted under the form of Nazi Imperialism which fired the Second World War. The concept of the Aryan Race as the paragon of the Human species and the North-European culture as the only pure and clean, fit for human beings, was the first manifestation of the aggressive policy of globalization, suppression and control of the earth.
However, the People globally did not accept and fought/ resisted to the end to this idea and its agent of suppression, which was the Hitlerian/ Nazi Germany, forcing the forces of the allies to enter the war since the Citizens of their states had already taken a clear and active stance against that sort of globalization. Thus, the experiment and this attempt failed.
The concept of globalization was muffled by the general propaganda and projection, to rise again less than 10 years later indirectly but definitely, through the assorted treaties/ plans/ dogmas which began to allow to third parties to intervene in the internal affairs or the decisions of other countries without being tagged as invaders or conquerors.
The pretext with which the countries of the world submitted and are submitting to such schemas par excellence is the avoidance of any strife, trouble and exposure to dangers of destabilization. Of course everything is done in the name of Freedom, democracy and security of the Citizens and thus we have the creation of the different unions, alliances and other such economic and/or military organizations.
Thus we now, at the beginning of the 21st century, have the founded existence of two great alliances/ organizations, one in Europe and one in America, and above those (theoretically) a global one guaranteeing the cooperation and alliance of all the states against some vague intruder/ destabilizer. This is the second manifestation of Globalization which, using the horror of the memories of the harsh wars of the 20th century, received the approval or at least the non-resistance in general trajectories, of the Peoples so that the avoidance of the occasion of future wars would be guaranteed.
However, the non-existence of violent incidents and warlike situations would not be to the interest of the enforcers of globalization as the existence of peace would take away any argument for further removal of freedoms and independence from the different states and their People. The very few war instances between states existing in the last decades of the 20th century also did not serve since the People interpreted them as isolated and self-contained incidents of local differences which did not concern the sum of the world and at the most suggested that one of the alliances/ organizations/ unions was not doing its job right. No other ramification could exist and for sure none that would restrict the People culturally, behaviorally and ideologically, since the freedom of expression and individuality (theoretically and officially) did not threaten the stability and well being of the Peoples.
Therefore, the need of a nightmarish enemy at least at Hitler’s level was rendered necessary to manage to restore the excuse that would allow the agents of globalization to shape not only the political and economic duties of the states but also the behavior and daily living of the Citizens on a singular, personal level: thus the vague, continuous and semi-invisible enemy of terrorist was created and promoted.
Terrorism does not need specific motives nor specific logic nor specific camps and certainly nor a finite number of leaders. It can take different forms with few demands for scenarios with coherence and primarily it can be used anywhere and directly to demonstrate to the People that they are in danger and need to show a specific type of behavior and identity to be protected and, at times, not prosecuted.
In particular, we have a return to the concept of the Aryan race through a different approach: terrorists and therefore dangers for the global peace and stability are usually, if not always, people who do not belong to this Aryan race and states which are not North-European or North-American. For someone living in the Balkans, Mediterranean or Middle East not to be considered terrorist, they would need to display behavior which falls in a very specific cultural framework, to condemn love towards their own Nation as nationalism and liberal and humanistic ideas for the good and equal living of every Citizen of the people as poplarism.
On a state level, in order not to consider a state dangerous and terrorist or a center of gathering of terrorists, there never must be noted discontent, protestation and/or political gathering/ reaction/ denial of acceptance of the government of that state. On the contrary, all the People ought to recognize dictatorial and totalitarian qualities in their ‘democratically’ elected government and accept any lawlessness, infringement of Human Rights, unacceptable or unsavory decisions and other things with no compunctions. The sensation and the unwritten law that the written laws exist but are not ascribed to wafts in the air and grants arbitrariness in specific rulers and highest social strata. In the instances where the accord of the People must necessarily be had to serve pretenses and the People are not giving it, the processes are catatonically repeated until the People give it, or a way is found to statistically show that the People is giving it despite the fact the People is resisting and opposing their intent clearly.
Thus we come to the application of the nazi ideal and the absolute enforcement through powers of suppression, but without having an open admission of the fact, even if the justification or pretext is threadbare.
And how do they invade each country in a nazi fashion?
In the preliminary stage, the invasion happened through economic imperialism, subjugating the states and the Peoples to economic international schemas on the one hand and in huge multinational workplace formations that did not answer to state laws on the other hand. In this way, in at least the last 30 years a status quo was created where the daily living of the Citizens depended on foreign control centers for both the expenses (taxation) as well as income (wages and market conditions).
Now, in the second stage there comes the establishment of the invisible enemy- terrorist who can strike at any time and any place, any Citizen regardless of socio-economic (theoretically) status. This enemy is curbed only by specific military segments which invade every country with this purpose (theoretically) in mind. In this way we have the military supremacy and control by the USA/ NATO in the Middle East and the Arabian states.
However, in the areas where the anthropological and social profile doesn’t match the terrorist one, as we described it, because the people already fit the standards of the modern Aryan Race, another methodology is used which was also created from the 1990s and onwards: waves of thousands upon thousands of immigrants/ refugees/ illegal aliens coming from the destabilized / ‘terrorist- under terrorism’ countries created pockets of ‘dangerous elements’ and possible terrorist hubs in the countries of the Aryans. In the same time, an ever worsening financial crisis was imposed in which the Citizens of these countries continually and progressively became impoverished while immigrants gained a higher social status and/or special privileged handling by the governments, which created and is creating the following situation: On the one part the indigenous populations began being hostile towards the immigrants in levels they weren’t before, on the other part the immigrants had and have hostility towards the indigenous populations due to bad relations and the economic demise of both these groups. Consequently, criminality is mathematically rising through vagrancy, begging, thieving, robbing and murdering that is attributed to immigrants, and the tolerance of the People to the immigrants is diminished to the minimum or completely evaporates.
Thus we are led to a volatile situation with assorted social strife, skirmishes and violence up to full blown civil wars. This intolerance is also transferred to the treatment of minorities in the same manner, especially in the case that these minorities have been fabricated through their population blow up by the immigrants while the population of the indigenous people is undersized due to unfavorable financial conditions.
The alliances/ organizations through education and other ‘social’ programs enforce educational curriculi which do not fit any culture and isolate through semi-literacy, unequal treatment of groups and a vague transferring of values and frameworks, and therefore the immigrant population is not absorbed into the indigenous one as it should be but becomes more and more hostile while theoretically taught peace, harmony and the value of individuality.
At this point and with these cultivated conditions we have the firing of destabilization and warlike situations which are the ticket of entry of military enforcement in the states without having the one ordering them be characterized as invader or conqueror: characteristic is the case of not only Kosovo but also of other countries, mainly of the former Easter Block until now where basic functions of the state infrastructure are taken up by third parties arbitrarily and without constitutional or legal base. We are alluding to EULEX, which in the past year (theoretically) and very possibly this year has practically assumed all administrative and judiciary duties in the government of Kosovo, and is enforced on the Citizens exactly as during World War II the Nazis enforced their own government composition in the states they conquered.
The term destabilization is truly ingenious because it has the quality of the wild card: destabilization can be anything from an arbitrary evaluation by the agents controlling EULEX that the government of the assorted state is inept, evil, immoral, powerless and the People undisciplined and spoilt, wild, deviant, to a ‘civil’ strife with real battles and street fights. In essence all the setting is ready and is already applied so that totalitarian Nazism be enforced and the beraching of Free Will, expression, culture and self-determination of the Peoples around the globe with this excuse. That which failed through direct enforcement on the ideological level during the Second World War now is applied silently in the name of the very values, principles and ideas that are being breached and trespassed.
In particular, the executive agent EULEX and the up to now unseen Euroarmy which is being created have no legal or moral base and actually infringe blatantly the very economic treaties/ unions they allude to and which forbid the intervening in any way in the internal affairs of a state beyond the very narrow economic framework, which every signing country has officially the capacity not to follow should that country wish it.
Also, the World Treaties/ Agreements are trespassed which forbid the existence of suppressive army in other allied countries in any way.
The censored presentation of incidents so that they are presented as theoretically uncontrollable disturbances which are attributed to the People and the misinformation taking place internationally regarding the power and the force and the legality of the assorted agents such as the European Eunion and NATO gives the footholds required for this blatant and fully nazi / fascist enforcement on all the states and all the Peoples without exception, by a little numbered group of invisibles who never have the courage to present themselves in person with their stance and their demands to control and subjugate the entire Humanity.
In our upcoming articles we will show how this is substantiated through genealogical trees of the assorted ‘agents’ in the international sociopolitical scene.
References (attention, the last two in Greek) :