The results of the 2009 Euroelections are highly important on multiple levels which demand and must have special analysis one by one. The voting- research- referendum demonstrated not only the real outlook and alignment of the People but also revealed information that are certainly not meant to be widely known nor by the political parties themselves nor by the mass media.
Primarily we will begin by analyzing the basic outcome and the resulting profile proving the true identity of the Greek People as well as that of the other groups existing along with them. The manner of analysis of the election result can be followed for any and every voting result in any and every country so that the Citizen of that country will be able to understand what it is that he/she is reading without needing interpretation from arbitrary sources trying to twist out of context the simple arithmetic and truth of numbers.
The first thing we look at a table of election results is the percentage of active voters – abstention. Abstention does not denote apathy but rather a rejection of the sum of choices offered for the vote. It is actually a very healthy choice because the voter abstaining denounces the logic “lesser than two evils” and refuses to pick “the least harmful of harmfuls” because he/she refuses to choose something that is harmful in any case.
In the euroelections, then, we have a 47.37% abstention which means that this percentage refuses to vote and give consent to the breaching and full distortion of the Institutions of Democracy as well as to the daily breaching of the Human and Political Rights of the Greek People. The mass media try to lessen and alter the impression of this result by unabashedly reporting that in the voter lists there are listings either of dead people or double or even triple listings of the same voter, and therefore the abstention is not that high. But if that is true, it constitutes an admission to full juggling of the vote ( officially individuals can vote many times over or in the place of the deceased) and therefore we have an official abolition of the Democracy as well as the whole election results, the current and the former ones. In reality such juggling can account for the maintenance of the bipartisan political condition as well as the adherence to the same policies with the People’s ‘tolerance’ who have not realized the coup that has taken place through the election juggle.
If however such a level of juggling does not exist and the abstention is what it is, we can easily with the rule of three sum and addition/ subtraction see the true force of all the political parties and what percentage in essence is governing against all the institutions of Democracy and the Principle of the Majority.
In particular, if we subtract from 100% of the electorate the percentage of the abstention, we have a 52.63% of voters who did vote and from which all the percentages of the results were yielded. That means that every percentage is the percentage on the 52.3% and not on the 100% of the electorate, as presented by the Ministry of Internal Affairs. Thus, to calculate the real percentage on the entire electorate (i.e. regardless of the abstention) we must find how much per cent is each percentage announced on the 100% and not on the 52.63% (i.e. not just on the sum of those who did vote, but on the sum of the entire list of voters whether they voted or not).
This calculation gives PASOK (middle-left) 19,29% of the entire electorate, i.e. of the true politically active People, to New Democracy (middle-right) 17%, to KKE (communist) 4.4%, to LAOS (far/ extreme right) 3.76%, to SYRIZA ( leftist) 2.47%, to Ecologist-Greens 1.84% and the rest/invalids/blank votes 3.9%.
During this week we will be analyzing each one of the true percentages and what the statements the political party leaders made on the night of the count mean, and based on these what we can expect as People.
Today we will simply see what is the true force of each party, i.e. the individuals who are organized party voters and who thus exploit the goods of the country and state through political party power (such as favours, jobbery, fundings, above-law protection, socioeconomic promotion, etc) and who the real Hellenic People are.
If we subtract the percentages of minority votes/ blanks/ invalids as well as that of the Ecologists-Greens as opposition votes, since multiple times Citizens declared they would cast like so after urging through various shows, the sum of the organized party voters exploiting the state and wealth of the country at the expense of the rest is 46.92% of the politically active population. This percentage is real historically as well since such are the people displaying anti-Social and anti-National activity and in every case have collaborated instead of resisting any totalitarian schema from German/Bulgarian/Italian Occupation, the security battalion officers, the communist-affiliated guerrillas to the junta of 1967, the ‘green tinted guards’ (PASOK partisans) and the matching ‘blue ones’ (New Democracy partisans).
The true People is 53.08% of the sum of the politically active individuals in Greece, also a true percentage which in 1981, after the junta of the army and the junta of Karamanlis that succeeded it, Andreas Papandreou managed to derail with the motto ‘change’ and the empty projection of the socialist schema.
However, right after the falsehood and embezzlement of the dreams/desires and endeavours of the People became clear, ever since 1983 (as I personally ascertained when I had taken up the qualitative market research of the then first euroelections, for the eurosocialist party represented in Greece by PASOK, commissioned as I was as psychologist-researcher by the company I was affiliated with) the People never gave their vote further to the percentage A. Papandreou had hit in 1981 with the method of lying. On the contrary, his party followed a progressively descending course until it finally had to rely (both PASOK and New Democracy) on just their organized party member force, the percentage of which we revealed above.
Therefore, the first and basic conclusion we must draw is highly joyous and tells us that the real People, coming up to 53% of the electorate is politically active, healthy and cannot be easily fooled any longer nor can they be convinced to abandon their intelligence and morality.
This People, with this percentage will immediately mobilize the moment a true resolution for the political stagnation becomes apparent, satisfying their demands and aspirations. Because the delusion the style of A. Papandreou cannot be of further use on this percentage or it will be so short-lived that it will be a shambles to anyone who attempts it, the handling directed towards this real People is different.
In these cases a policy of fragmentation and diversion by external stimuli and threats is applied while internally there is violent upheaval, as we have historically experienced throughout the 20th century Greece, from the case of the Asia Minor Destruction of 1922 to the case of the Civil War right after WWII to the case of the landing of the Turks in Cyprus.
Analyzing the reactions and words / hints made by the political party leaders of every party in our coming articles, we will see how not to allow the repetition of history at this historical time, which simply requires the same alertness by this 53% and the empowerment of their moral as true Greek Citizen with Political Conscience, Intelligence and Intent to protect him/herself and his/her State.